...
- Bestehende Daten müssen angepasst werden?
- Ist es sinnvoll zwei Ziele in ein Feld einzutragen, oder sollten nicht zwei Felder angewendet werden?
- 506 1# $a Access restricted to registered users by appointment. Plan your visit and view user policies here: $u https://library.columbia.edu/libraries/rbml/usingcollections.html $0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
- Es könnten Nutzungshinweise in einem eigenen Feld beschreiben werden.
- Es sind präzisere Anleitungen notwendig, um die möglichen Vorteile vollständig nutzen zu können.
Externe Diskussion
Erste schriftliche Kommentare von DACH-Seite an die MARC-E-Mail-
...
Liste
"
"
While we think that we understand the need here, we do not support the approach taken by
...
this paper. We were one of the parts of the MARC community who quite recently drove the enrichment
...
of fields 506, 540 and 856 for Open Access and license information, and we are heavily and
...
growingly using these format elements. We are not convinced that, as the authors of the paper noted, "
...
the existing subfield $u in field 506 serves a different purpose than subfields $0 or $1 would."
...
The existence of subfields $0 or $1 is quite unusual in fields of the 5XX range, and mostly for
...
good reasons, from our perspective. It would become too complicated to look for possibly the
...
same information in three subfields. According to the discussions last summer, the distinction
...
between subfields $0 and $1 is unclear and still to be clarified. So we recommend to explore whether
...
subfield $u is sufficient."
im Archiv unter https://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2401&L=MARC&P=15832"
Nebenthema: zur unklaren Unterscheidung von $0 einerseits und $1 andererseits
Protokoll des MAC-Treffens Juni 2023: 2023 MAC Annual Meeting Minutes - darin Abschnitt "MAC Discussion: URIs in Subfields $0 and $1 of the MARC 21 Formats"
...